forecasting the next war <looking for the WMD>

Guest · Mar 31, 2003

I'm looking at the map of the middle east, and listening to Mr. Powell, and here is what i see as the future targets of the US Govt.

Mr. Powell is talking about Syria 24h/24h, like they are not in war with Iraq any more.

The <free> press is trying to pass the information that Saddam may have hidden the WMD in Syria, which would be a great reason to attack Syria next.

Once they finish the job in Iraq, they will invade Syria, only to find out that the Syrians may have shipped the WMD to Lebanon.

<You see the south -> north direction of the war here ? Koweit->Iraq->Syria->Lebanon >

Now, the real problem comes up when they invade Lebanon, because they will not be able to say that Lebanon dropped the WMD in the Mediteran Sea, because it would not be possible, due to the USA military presence there.

I guess they will say that the WMD have been transported by planes, from Lebanon to N.Korea, and that will be a great reason to go East, occupy N.Korea, and get ready for China, a country that N.Korea will ship the WMD to.

After the Chinese adventure, the US army will hit the Russia, a country that will take the WMD from China.

Well, that's where the journey may very well end.

Napoleon stopped there, Hitler as well.

Guest · Mar 31, 2003

>Mr. Powell is talking about Syria

And he is the "dove" in the Admin.

GeorgeWBush · Mar 31, 2003

Don Marco,

Wow... You caught me. That "south->north" direction of the war. Pure brilliance. But you forgot about the secret mind-control rays... Those are a huge part of the plan. I, along with the secret group of 12 people who truly control the majority of the world, must have the mind control rays to implement our sinister plans.

Have a great evening,
GWB

Gargoyle · Mar 31, 2003

I think Kuwait would be easier to take then Syria. Iran has some nice oil fields too. With us in Afghanistan and Iraq we can squeeze Iran. Syria, yuck, who the fvck wants syria? No one takes Syria syriasly. Couldn't help that, been dying to use that one.

North Korea just seems like such a pain in the ass. We might have to send some cruise missiles toward their reactors and get China to put some pressure on them. Do we really need North Korea? I don't think so.

Can we rename Iraq? Sounds too much like "I wreck". Who wants to be known as a wreck. I sure don't and I don't believe the 'I wreckies' do either. "Chevron" sounds so much cooler, don't you think? Where u from? I'm from Chevron. Plus all your clothes can have those cool sergeant stripes on the sleeves (Yes, I know they are called chevrons). Now it's just a toss up between Chevronians or Chevronites?

Kurds and whey? What is a Kurd and who the fvck thought of that name too? Sounds too much like Turd and we all know what a shitty name that is! We need to change their name too. How about Exxon? That sounds cool too! So we have the Exxonites and the Chevronites and we can have peace in the middle east.